Talk:USS Tucker (DD-57)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Below is my review:


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Lead: 'Tucker sailed off the east coast and in the Caribbean' - Not quite elegant
 * Good point. I've changed so it says "sailed in the Atlantic and the Caribbean" — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Design and construction: 'the great, great, granddaughter' - I am not sure if comma is the right way to go here. I think hyphens should be used.
 * Yes, you're right. Changed. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Post-war: 'Departing from Brest for the last time on 16 December 1918, she headed for Boston, and a period of repairs in the navy yard.' - either incomplete or confusing.
 * Reworded. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Tucker was acquired by the coast guard on 25 March (according to text) and on 26 March (according to infobox) - something is not right here.
 * The correct date was 25 March; one of the sources listed the date as "25 Mar 26" which must have been what threw me off. :) — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:




 * Thanks - DSachan (talk) 14:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I've addressed all points. Thanks for the review. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)