Talk:USS Wainwright (DD-62)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Below is my review:


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I think Reinstated should go before Struck in infobox, so that the dates follow the chronological order.
 * Good point. Swapped.
 * Early Career - 'She returned to Boston on the 10th for a short period in the Navy Yard': 10th of February or March?
 * Changed to 10 March. — Bellhalla (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * World War I - 'Wainwright again briefly patrolled Hampton Roads before heading for the New York Navy Yard on the 14th': 14th of what? I think it is April, which apparently becomes clear later, but should be mentioned here at the first instance.
 * Good suggestion. Changed. — Bellhalla (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * World War I - 'This division— ably led by Comdr. Joseph K. Taussig': I guess the use of words such as ably is discouraged per WP:MoS.
 * Yes, it is discouraged and I just missed this one. (With some of these DANFS-based articles it's hard to catch all of the jingoistic and/or pro-American statements.) — Bellhalla (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Discrepancy in speed - 56 km/h (text) and 56.8 km/h (infobox)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:



Thanks - DSachan (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I've addressed all of your concerns. If this passes, you will have exhausted all of my GA nominations (except for John Henry Turpin) in a two-day span. Thanks! — Bellhalla (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Bellhalla, speed issue is not yet addressed. I somehow missed Turpin's nomination. I can do it later today. DSachan (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't know how I missed that, but I think I've got it now. Also, thanks for the Turpin review, too. — Bellhalla (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)