Talk:USS Winnebago (1863)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 04:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll do this one.


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

No dablinks, no issues with prose, external links or citation errors, images good. Zawed (talk) 04:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) There is no reference for note 12 (ORN vol. 7).
 * Copy-paste error, fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Note issue (criteria 2) fixed, passing for GA. Zawed (talk) 10:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)