Talk:US Organization

Untitled
No sources, and it reads like a conspiracy theory page. -T.Callahan

k
Want to add more? You said less than one sentence, you need more than that...

Page Moved from United Slaves
I moved this page away from United Slaves to US Organization. The latter was the term used by members of the organization, while the former was a derogatory term employed by their rivals the Black Panthers which for some reason has caught on even among many scholars of African American history (see my footnote for a reference to a chapter in an edited book by an academic press which explains the confusion). I also obviously changed references to the United Slaves in the body of the article.

This article does need to be sourced, although the points about the FBI playing US and the Panthers off against each other are well established and widely known (I believe some of the FBI files have been released because of FOIA requests). But more needs to be said about this organization beyond the rivalry with the Panthers and the trial of Karenga and the others (that section is where some real sourcing is needed because whoever put it there is clearly drawing very specific information from somewhere). US represented the "cultural nationalist" strain of the Black Power movement and attention should be drawn to this. I plan to work on this article in a couple of months when I have some time, but if anyone wants to do anything in the meantime the book chapter I mentioned in my recent edit and the book Fighting for US by Scot Brown are useful sources to start giving this article some more depth and some proper citations.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 19:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Corrections to link
There was an error in the reference to a link in the article. Cleaned that up and added a few more requests for citation. Although the article appears to be relatively NPOV, the citations are needed, as this subject could draw the ire of both supporters and detractors of the organization. Kemkerj (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Plaigarism
A lot of this is directly lifted from another article without proper citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.10.7.13 (talk) 18:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on US Organization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110708095122/http://media.www.brookhavencourier.com/media/storage/paper807/news/2008/11/24/News/Kwanzaa.Celebrates.Culture.Principles-3560412.shtml to http://media.www.brookhavencourier.com/media/storage/paper807/news/2008/11/24/News/Kwanzaa.Celebrates.Culture.Principles-3560412.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 04:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on US Organization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051227043552/http://www.us-organization.org:80/ to http://www.us-organization.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Possible TYPO (or other mistake) in a section name
The name of the section "Gun battle at UCLA (1968)" contains the year number "1968".

However, the body of (the text of) that section, does not contain any year number except for "1969".

Is that a mistake? Should the section name be [changed to] "Gun battle at UCLA (1969)" -- ? --

Any comments? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 23:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I think you are correct... and fixed by simply removing the year. Blueboar (talk) 23:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)