Talk:U Saw

Edit
I edited the article to make it more neutral (and corrected a few typos). To start at the end, there's no place in an encyclopedia for editorial comment on the trustworthiness or otherwise of references - if they're not trustworthy, don't cite them at all. IMO Kin Oung is trustworthy enough to stay in. The other edits are simply aimed at removing contentious material - the whole subject of Aung San's assassination is a happy hunting ground for conspiracy theorists, and in these circumstances it's best to say as little as possible. Nonetheles, I don't think there's any doubt of U Saw's guilt - he never denied it. PiCo 07:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Bold text

British officers involved in the assassination
This article says that low-ranking officers were involved and describes how one officer provided arms. The Aung San article refers to middle-ranking officers being "involved" in the plot - which implies more than just providing guns. -- Beardo (talk) 15:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on U Saw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927195434/http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=719 to http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=719

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Galon U Saw 1941.jpg

Why did he do it?
Why? There's a case that he did it because Aung San promised too much to Shans and Karens (Independence etc.) and U Saw thought the only way to prevent a breakup of Burma was to assassinate Aung San. How much credit does that argument have? 2100s (talk) 01:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)