Talk:Uebert Angel

partisan sources template
Seems like the ministry wrote this entry alone. Edits like these aren't acceptable, this needs oversight. There's massive criticism of Uebert Angel's business practices, this needs to be included. tickle me 03:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks for your concerns. Look back through the article history and check the threads above, and you'll see that a few editors have been cleaning up the hyperbole and misinformation that has been continuously added to the article for the last four years. Another set of eyes on the article would be most welcome. --RexxS (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks for your concerns. Look back through the article history and check the threads above, and you'll see that a few editors have been cleaning up the hyperbole and misinformation that has been continuously added to the article for the last four years. Another set of eyes on the article would be most welcome. --RexxS (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023
Change the following sentence from "Al Jazeera's reporters acting as customers caught stating "You want gold, gold we can do it right now, we can make the call right now, and it’s done,"." To: Al Jazeera's reporters acting as customers recorded Angel stating, "You want gold, gold we can do it right now, we can make the call right now, and it’s done,".

Grammatical correction. A.douglas17 (talk) 09:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ M.Bitton (talk) 12:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 May 2023
The Aljazeera source is biased and It doesn't confirm the money laundering allegations. These are allegation and this article mentions that he has been implicated. He hasn't been charged, the government has confirmed that nothing like that has ever happened. IT's only right to delete that part. All the statements that you claim to be promotional is not and this should work both ways. Why only focus on the bad things about this man? It seems as if this page is targeting Uebert Angel more than focusing on quality information that will inform people. Smells hate. Munya29 (talk) 07:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Al Jazeera is considered a reliable source per WP:RSPSS. Wikipedia is not censored and the information should remain if backed up by a reliable source. Lightoil (talk) 12:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 April 2023
Please make the following change to the article:
 * Since information came from the Zimbo Live News which appears an unreliable source and the Gistmania source is listed as a spam source per WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/gistmania.com. I have tried to find a reliable source but my search results came up with nothing.


 * As well as delete "In 2013 his name was included on a list of people who bought fake degrees from an online degree mill" from the last paragraph in the lead section since it's not sourced and comes from the same sources.
 * Add "ambassador" to the short description since the role was mentioned in several locations in notable news publications such as The Chronicle, please take a look here. Best Exposstage (talk) 23:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)


 * ✅ ZionniThePeruser (talk) 20:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 May 2024
Allegiations of sexual misconduct and fraud has no reputable/ authentic sources. All sources are African gossip tabloids and sites. Completely against what Wikipedia stands for. Entire paragraph should be deleted. Hannahl1328 (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  thetechie@enwiki  :  ~/talk/  $  03:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)