Talk:Ulmus crassifolia

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Ulmus crassifolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120331081433/http://www.sunshinenursery.com/SunshineNursery/Elm_leaf_beetle_survey.html to http://www.sunshinenursery.com/SunshineNursery/Elm_leaf_beetle_survey.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

irrelevant citations
The citations numbered 3 and 4 are duplicates with different years. However, they have the same volume and issue numbers as well as title. Additionally, the publication that is being cited both correctly and incorrectly is irrelevant to this article as it is describing the species Ulmus ismaelis, but there is no mention of Ulmus ismaelis in this article. If the author wants to include information regarding U. ismaeli as it relates to U. crassifolia, then I can see reason to include it here. But in its current state, this article should not include these citations. By the way, the correct date for the citation is 1998. KShearer (talk) 21:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * additionally, there are several broken links that need to be fixed/deleted KShearer (talk) 21:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)