Talk:Umm ar-Rihan

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Umm ar-Rihan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101210000000/http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1487.pdf to http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1487.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/e9abb7dfb6e319c90525675900535dba/d2f86a14289df2a085256ea1006e5f3a%21OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Concern for biased articles as a basis for new edits
As this topic has just become media popular, thanks to an article posted on social media, its worth touching on the matter of biased articles used as a pretext to insert biased text into this article.

The article in question is found at https://www.ynetnews.com/article/b164zldap. ynetnews is an Israeli media outlet that claims to have no overt political agenda. However Im concerned that the article uses inflammatory rhetoric, and has clear pro-Israel bias that I feel makes it unfit for sourcing a completely new section that attempts to establish a Jewish connection to the place after widespread article proliferation, which could be used in an attempt to establish authenticity of such claims in a feedback loop.

In the new section titled "Pre-British Mandate era", there is novel rhetoric referencing Jewish periods and introducing new information sourced solely from the article in question, where the rest of the article references Roman periods and ruins.

I think that an un-biased corroborating source should be found if this passage is to remain in this article. Vrrtigo (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)