Talk:Unbiunium

Stub?
I changed the the rating to stub, as "5" is not a rating. Beast of traal  T   C  22:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC) Beast of traal

Electron Configuration
Unbiunium's electron configuration will not be [2, 8, 18, 32, 33, 18, 8, 2], it will be [2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 9, 2]. That is clearly wrong. 86.138.142.213 (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

I think it is the electron configuration of 5g^1 that is wrong. Analogous to Lanthanum and Actinium, one electron in the d-block occurs first, and then the f-block starts. I think the same thing might occur here, where one 7d^1 electron occurs first, before the g-block (in fact I believe one d electron fills, then one f electron, then the g-block, then the rest of the f-block, then the rest of the d-block.) 99.175.101.245 (talk) 23:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * It'll actually probably be [2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8, 3]. Double sharp (talk) 12:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

2-8-18-32-32-18-8-2
It is probably possible for there to be >120 protons, but when there are 120 electrons, extra electrons probably wouldn't orbit causing the atom to stay as an ion.

207.6.81.95 (talk) 08:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)Mr. Anonymous

Pm + Nd=Ubu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.123.136 (talk) 14:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Not likely at all. The probability of fusion decreases very quickly as the projectile grows in size relative to the target. Double sharp (talk) 08:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Good Article nomination (2017)
22:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Infobox unbiunium isotopes
FYI has been nominated for deletion -- 65.93.183.33 (talk) 12:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)