Talk:Uncommon Women and Others (play)

I don't know if the banner was intentional about the primary sources or not. But I would suggest moving it if you can, or adding a space or a title before you start your article. This banner so close to the text makes it a bit cluttered at the top!. Maybe go through and if you see a word that maybe not all people understand, turn it into a wiki link or whatever it is called in the [ ]. And maybe get rid of the stub part on the bottom. So far it is looking good! Keep up the good work! 15:17, 15 November 2014 (UTC) (Bree)

Hey, Deja! So, you have a lot of links that are blue, which is great because that means they are leading somewhere, but you also have a bunch that are red, which means they don't go anywhere. Maybe think about removing the linking code from those words. Also, while the summary gives enough information about the play so as to help someone interested decide whether or not they want to actually read it, think about expanding it a little bit. It currently reads like the back of a play or book — very neat and tidy but not overly descriptive. Overall though, it looks great! Logan.grabiel (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Deja,

Your play sounds really interesting and you do a good job at pointing out the important themes the play explores. Your expansion of the plot summary definitely helps a non-reader of the play better understand the important characters and actions that occur. You might want to add an additional section discussing and analyzing the characters and how their stories relate back to the central plot of the play. Furthermore, you might want to make a character list with a small description for each of the main characters in the plot. These two additions would help a non-reader of the play better comprehend what thematic meaning the author is trying to communicate.

Your play sounds really interesting and I can't wait to hear your oral report!

Colter Colterlena (talk) 17:27, 17 November 2014 (UTC)