Talk:Underground Astronauts

Anyone, nominate this article for deletion
Ãnyone should nominate this article for deletion. The phrase/name is not notable, although used by media perhaps more than once. (Later one can deal with the issue of university students who each have their article on Wikipedia.). Signed, another 30-meter-underground-"astronaut", 89.8.158.26 (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC) In 2019 there was a half-hearted attempt at having the articled merged (and thereby deleted). However there was no claim that the phrase/name is not notable. When nominating the article for deletion again, there needs to be a justification or rationale, for deletion: Example, "non-notable name/phrase". I support having the article deleted - the name/phrase does not seem notable, even though media has used the name/phrase at least once. 89.8.158.26 (talk) 17:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

"Controversy"
Regarding the final sentence of this section; does the fact Berger released the findings as open access really add to the controversy? Surely, this particular move has not been criticised or deemed controversial. 2A02:C7C:5690:A000:6DA0:3C03:1043:2CB (talk) 11:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)


 * If I am wrong about that then it needs to be explained in the paragraph. 2A02:C7C:5690:A000:6DA0:3C03:1043:2CB (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)