Talk:Underoath/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

A GAR request has been requested by. I agree that there needs to be a lot of work on this article. From them What a mess! I am seeing unaddressed maintenance tags that are over a year old and extremely under-covered sections dating back to when the band reunited in 2015. In addition, there are several uncited statements throughout; a few obvious ones, including at least one citation needed tag. This article looks emaciated for a "good article" in some cases. To add the prose falls away where there are any mentions from 2010 onwards with several short sentence paragraphs and lack of flow. Not sure whats up with the citation overkill in the genre section. A lot of work needed here. Aircorn (talk) 00:32, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * note the nominator has not edited for several years. Aircorn (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Honestly? The only one I think is truly overkill in the genre section is metalcore. Underoath used to be, and still sometimes is, a hot topic of debate on genre, so the fact that some have five is probably to ward off vandals. This article has much, much more worrisome problems.  danny music editor  oops 05:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delisting Issues still outstanding. Aircorn (talk) 18:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)