Talk:Unending/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Okay, the article's looking awesome right now, and there are just a few little things that need fixing to achieve GA status: You've got a week to make any necessary changes to the article - good luck :) — 97198   talk  07:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * As the episode – and the series – comes to a close -> use emdashes here.
 * Per WP:DASH, ndashes can be used in place of mdashes at any time, and since I am averse to mdashes (they don't exist in my mothertongue), I have reverted to ndashes after Mastrchf 's change. – sgeureka t•c 18:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * by having them sleep together without a confrontation -> do we need the euphemism for sex?
 * Claudia Black and Michael Shanks protested this intended story -> I usually would say that "somebody protests something", but rather they protest against something, just as one would disagree with or object to.
 * VisFX matte extention were used -> "extension"?
 * making Stargate SG-1 the third most-watched programme for Sky One -> we're talking about a British channel but we've used American spelling up till this point, so keep it consistent and use "program".
 * IGN does not need italicising.
 * Image:Stargate SG-1 Unending.jpg is currently twice the size as it is used in the article, which seems unnecessary per resolution restrictions under fair use.
 * I've done everything except the image resizing, which I should be able to do soon. Mastrchf (t/c) 14:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Image resized to 400x225 (0.09 megapixels), which should be alright per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. The make-up is discussed in the article, so a little extra zooming-in should be allowed. Oh, and thanks for the review, 97198. – sgeureka t•c 18:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Article looks pretty good, my only real issue that has yet to be brought up is the removal of the second paragraph in the lead section. I do not feel that it is necessary or really adds much to the article.--88wolfmaster (talk) 08:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * As the lead section is supposed to summarise an article, I think it's absolutely fine and necessary to provide a wholistic synopsis of the article. All other changes look good, and so does the low-res, and at this point I'm happy to promote :) — 97198   talk  10:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)