Talk:Unfaithful (song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jivesh boodhun (talk · contribs) 12:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Lead

 * Generally well written. I did some minor tweaks. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Infobox

 * Link both Tor Erik Hermansen, Mikkel S. Eriksen under Stargate and unlink the producer.
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Background and release

 * by American singer and songwriter - already in lead
 * Removed— Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * which Ne-Yo also wrote - remove also
 * Removed— Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 *  The song was produced by Stargate[4] and recorded at Battery and Avatar Studios in New York City, Loft Recording Studios in Bronxville and Digital Insight Recording Studios in Las Vegas.[5] The song was mixed by Phil Tan and Makeba Ridick provided vocal production.[5] - Close repetition of The song
 * Changed— Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The song was released as the second single from A Girl like Me, only after the US number-one single "SOS". The song was released to digital outlets in Canada on June 20. 2006.[6] - Again
 * Changed— Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Overall: It's good at GA level but if yo want to take it to FA (it has got potential), you will need to paraphrase the quotes. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I will think about it, but its a good idea. — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Music and lyrics

 * According to the sheet music published by Universal Music Publishing Group at Musicnotes.com, it is composed in the key of G minor and set in common time with a slow feeling groove. - was composed + link key, common time and groove
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * from the low note of F3 to C5 - from the low note of F3 to the high note of C5
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * by the works - work
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 *  In the beginning, the song's structure built around piano as the only instrument; the percussion and strings was added late - Something is missing.
 * was, right?— Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * According to Brandee J. Tecson of MTV - MTV or MTV News?
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Unlink ballad
 * Removed — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * In an interview with MTV - In an interview for the same publication
 * Changed— Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * "we - "We
 * Changed — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * In another interview with NewsDay - for
 * Changed — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Quentin B. Huff of PopMatters criticized the song's lyrics and described them as well-intentioned but "overboard with melodrama" and "devoid of remorse".[12] Regarding Rihanna's vocals in the song, Bill Lamb of About.com commented that they are not particularly strong and in places sound thin and reedy.[17] - Won't this fit in reception?
 * I removed Bill Lamb's part. But I think Quentin one should stay, because he comments on the lyrics. Can you re-format the first sentence? — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Reception and accolades

 * In a review of A Girl like Me - Unnecessary
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * While reviewing the single - Again
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * , in a review of the album, - Same
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Celia San Miguel from Vibe magazine, in a review of the album, praised "Unfaithful" and the other ballads on it, stating that the ballads give Rihanna a "new found charisma, solid vocal range and her ability to channel deep-rooted emotions with ease". - Celia San Miguel from Vibe magazine praised "Unfaithful", stating that it gives Rihanna a "new found charisma, solid vocal range and her ability to channel deep-rooted emotions with ease".
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Why is Billboard not lined?
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * A reviewer from Billboard magazine likened the song to Beyoncé Knowles' works and concluded that the song reveals Rihanna as a "young vocalist growing into her own" - Repetitive use of the words the song + work should be singular
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Knowles's  - I see an extra "s"
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * In 2011, Billboard - Billboard magazine for consistency
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * at number nine on its list of the Top 10 Singles of the Year - which year?
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Top 100 Pop Songs of 2006 commenting "It's all about that one word...murderer." - Top 100 Pop Songs of 2006, commenting, "It's all about that one word...murderer."
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Chart performance

 * Never start with The song
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * in the United States. - US
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If you say  US Hot Dance Club Songs chart - then also put chart after the Hot 100 one
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * were sold - Not sold but shipped
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The next week - The next week,
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * by International Federation of the Phonographic Industry - by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI)
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Again, not selling but shipping
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * on July 22, 2006 and the next week - on July 22, 2006, and the next week,
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  13:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Music video

 * Good. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Live performances

 * I can't at that wig :P
 * where she won the award for Best R&B Act - Necessary?
 * I did some tweaks here and in he video section as well.
 * Consider reading this section and remove unnecessary details. The prose is in fact good but this section is over-detailed. We do not need to know about so many other songs. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ — Tomica   (talk)  15:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Other sections look good. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

As it stands now

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Passing now. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)