Talk:Unfinished Business (2015 film)

RfC: LGBT categories?
Due to the fact that a main protagonist is LGBT, as well as many scenes pertaining to the LGBT protagonist dealing with LGBT issues, are LGBT categories suitable for this article? Boaxy (talk) 20:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I would say that LGBT categories are suitable, though you may want another opinion. However, please be aware that this is not the purpose of the request for comment system. The RfC system is used for disputes between editors that have been extensively discussed on the article's talk page, not for general questions. For more information, see the request for comment page. In future, please try a comment on the talk page without a Request for Comment and/or go to Ask for help. Thanks! Max0987654321 (talk) 02:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No I been using wikipedia for ten years now. I know the protocol thank you. This is a dispute, albeit a silent discriminatory one, but this is a dispute, and this is the right decision to make. Ill give it another week or so and I'll add the categories and sources, and I'm glad you agree with me. Boaxy (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose for lack of reliable sources, and due to the misunderstanding of the LGBT categories.--Loyalmoonie (talk) 22:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Chris
 * More information needed: "LGBT categories" is horribly vague, especially for an RfC, where the wording should generally be as specific as possible. I'm uncomfortable weighing in without knowing which specific categories are being considered for this article. DonIago (talk) 14:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * LGBT related American films. Damn, why do I have to be so anal with you guys. I'm just gonna add the stuff myself. One of the main characters featured on the damn cover is LGBT, and the film goes into that deeper. Sources will be added, and so will the categories. Boaxy (talk) 08:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You have to be "anal" because some editors, myself included, want to know exactly what they're supporting or opposing, rather than have it turn out that what they supported/opposed wasn't what they thought they were supporting/opposing at the time. I can't imagine that it would take you all that long to specify the categories, and doing so, rather than complaining, would show more commitment to the change you hope to make. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

was the glory hole penis scenes necessary what an attack to sense that. 2601:6C4:202:B800:DC55:5B3:6764:2E62 (talk) 06:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)