Talk:Unibrow/Archive 3

Greater Iran
Is there a source of that info? I have not met anyone from that area that thinks that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.132.82.223 (talk) 08:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Superstition, second paragraph
Is it just me or does this paragraph make no sense at all? Even aside from references to this "U.S. Werewolf" (an odd way to decribe a creature of European folklore), I just can't figure out exactly what this is meant to say :S 80.229.81.26 (talk) 14:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

AARRGH
This talk page is even more painful than the article itself. How about the article follow the consensus view that mentioning a few prominent people with unibrows is enough without assembling trivia sections attempting to find and document every real or imagined unibrow that has ever been. Really, this article is nothing but a dictionary definition coupled with unreferenced OR, since it does not cite a single reliable source. Beeblbrox (talk) 06:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with you! I support your edits! Brianreading (talk) 18:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Merge
please see Talk:Synophrys Beeblbrox (talk) 23:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 10 days with no comment, let silence speak consent Beeblbrox (talk) 04:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I have remerged after it was unmerged. Articles are about things, not terms, and having two separate articles is a form of content forkery. — Æµ§œš¹  [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]  22:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Alistair Darling
Why does he need a citation? Is it not possible just to click on his name and be presented with the synophrytic truth? User:LaFoiblesse 2008-11-09 23:17 (GMT)

==Image copyright problem with File:20110419 Anthony Davis at Jordan Brand Classic.jpg The image File:Frida Kahlo (self portrait).jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --16:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Fixed...Modernist (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Images

Why not use this one from the eyebrows article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Konferencja_Wikimedia_Polska_2007_-_Holek.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.26.152 (talk) 09:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I modified the image that was being used to improve it's quality.

What do you guys think? --Joel M. (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I think we need someone with a more epic unibrow. Richard001 (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Does this qualify as more epic? It is a lot higher resolution than the one suggested above. I can try it with different facial expressions or lighting if desired. Also, I will have access to a better camera soon (by 10/16/2012). Feel free to edit the photo for optimal contrast and unibrow viewing and all. The current photo is a nightmare. If no response soon, I will make this one the photo in the meantime.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Z11o22 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok, well now we have all the pictures up. The Davis one still weak but no better close ups on commons, unless somewhat wants to crop one down or find a non-copyright image somewhere else on the internet.

Grammar used in this article
Good lord, it's almost like children wrote this article. I just cleaned up the Popular Culture section a bit (forgot to sign in beforehand), and it honestly was a train wreck. Looking around at the revision history, it seems that the contributers thus far have only cleaned up minor punctuation mistakes. Not a complete overhaul like mine. Go take a look, and tell me that it's not better now ^_^ Breakingspell (talk) 05:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I cleaned it up again. 67.100.127.24 (talk) 11:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Well-known Character
The German article mentions Bert from Sesamestreet as a well-known Character with a Unibrow. My English ist not good enough to put this into this article or to discuss if this information is worth to be part of the article. Jan Tietje (talk) 15:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Unibrows are also frowned upon in India
It is considered not in good taste for women to have excess hare in strange places of the face in India and the unibrow is part of that.

You can google the actress Kajol and her unibrow and see how much fun is being poked at her for it on a regular basis. So it is not a western vs. non-western thing.

This is in reference to the following statement: In Asian countries like India, Nepal, Korea and Bangladesh (etc.) uni-brows are considered to be an "feature of culture". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.48.78.34 (talk) 13:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Citation 7
I don't get how citation 7 is related to this topic at all. Shouldn't it be removed?