Talk:Unification of theories in physics

Great unifications
this article, and the text you reverted at Newton's law of universal gravitation, are based on a large number of high quality sources. In case you have already looked at the ones in this article, see some more below:
 * Encyclopedia.com
 * Encyclopedia.com
 * Encyclopedia.com

All of these, and many more, use the exact terminology described in this article. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * This page is redundant with Theory of everything, which already describes the topic and its history in more detail. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 04:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The ToE is also known as the "final unification". None of the other unifications have been described as a theory of everything or final unification, either now or at original publication.
 * This article is analogous to World war, and the Theory of everything article to Third world war (or armageddon).
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No, this article is analogous to Theory_of_everything. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Dictionary definition of “antecedent”: “ someone or something existing or happening before”.
 * The subtitle you linked to is explicit that the other unifications are not the topic of that article. Onceinawhile (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The concept of unification, by itself, isn't something I've seen discussed in physics as a concept unto itself. If you can find any reputable sources that mention this as a broad concept that's a part of physics - outside of pedagogical explanations building up to a Theory of Everything, I think that the page would be justified by itself. But I haven't seen it used outside of those cases in my own experience. For now, I've made it redirect to ToE. &#32;- carchasm (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for this. I was not pinged so I did not see your edit. You are welcome to take this to AfD if you like. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)