Talk:Unifly

Source review

 * User:Slashme: I think this passes the GNG. Will review further if there is disagreement. --Slashme (talk) 17:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Reliable? I think so: published by Time Inc. Not just a blog. Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable? Seems to be. Has an editorial board. Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Probably. Trade publication, but doesn't seem to be just a regurgitation of press releases. Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable? Probably. Has an editorial board Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Probably. Trade publication, but doesn't seem to be just a regurgitation of press releases. Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage? No Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable? Probably. Has an editorial board Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Seems to be Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Borderline Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable? Probably. Has an editorial board Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Borderline. Seems suspiciously much like a warmed-up press release. Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable? Probably. Has an editorial board Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Borderline; looks a bit like a reheated press release. Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable? Probably. Typical trade publication with an editorial board. Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Mostly. Seems a bit prone to repeating what the companies say. Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source? Basically a repetition of the The Drive article at the top of the list. Doesn't count separately. Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage? No, just a listing. Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable? Seems to be. Has an editorial board at least. Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Borderline. Seems to be reproducing the company line a bit too closely? Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable?
 * Independent? Probably not; looks like a press-release. Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? No Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable? Seems to be. Has an editorial board. Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Probably. Trade publication, but clearly not just a regurgitation of press releases. Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Independent? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Significant coverage? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Secondary source? Yes Slashme (talk)
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Reliable?
 * Independent?
 * Significant coverage?
 * Secondary source?
 * Secondary source?