Talk:Unilever/Archives/2016

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.foodprocessing-technology.com/news/news97397.html
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

July/August 2016 Salmonella affair
The section titled "July/August 2016 Salmonella affair" is really confusing. It looks like it was written by someone familiar with the story who wrote the section assuming everyone already knows about it. There is no context for someone unfamiliar with the story. It also seems to have been written by someone who does not speak English as a first language. I'd like to clean it up, but I can't figure it out myself. Maybe someone familiar with the news story can rewrite the section to be more understandable. Deli nk (talk) 12:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)