Talk:Unionsexpressen

Article name
From their website, if (unfortunately) seems that their name is written in CamelCase, UnionsExpressen. Punkmorten (talk) 10:15, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thankfully, Manual of Style (trademarks) lets the editor choose if camelcase should be used or not for trademarks. Personally, if I find that the camelcase is only used some times, I prefer doing the company a favor and using correct typography. I also notice that as far as I can see, all the newspapers covering the company choose to use a small e. I can't stop you from moving the page, but I believe I have grounds to not have to move it myself. Arsenikk (talk)  12:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, I won't move it. Punkmorten (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't be the only one who sees the reason for the capital E in UnionsExpressen?. Without it it becomes "union sexpressen"Petethewhistle (talk) 22:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Bankruptcy
From what I have read on railway discussion boards, Unionsexpressen Scandinavian Railway AB has gone bankrupt after changing its name to Subis AB. Unfortunately I am unable to find a more reliable source spelling this out clearly, although what I did find supports what was posted on the discussion board. That a company called Subis AB is bankrupt is certain, but its association with Unionsexpressen is less clear. Unionsexpressen's web pages provide no updated information. The company listed as the domain's owner (Nordic Haulage AB) is however also listed as bankrupt. Should this article be updated to reflect that Unionsexpressen is a thing of a past? It can be changed again if the train service somehow manages to revive itself. Ters (talk) 23:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Rewritten to past tense now. Arsenikk (talk)  11:46, 5 May 2010 (UTC)