Talk:Unis (TV channel)

Requested move 4 August 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved, no consensus for move given participation, oppose from a week ago uncountered. (non-admin closure) — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 02:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Unis (TV channel) → Unis TV – this is the title displayed at the top of http://unis.ca/ and is also in the present logo seen at the top Ranze (talk) 17:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose TV is merely there on the website to identify it as a TV channel rather than a streaming service. Just because it's on the web doesn't make it irrefutable. Unless this is instituted on-air there is no need for change.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 18:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Countering
and I did not know this received criticism and was not able to reply prior to closure. Would like to discuss the issue further. "Aujourd'hui sur Unis TV" for example appears on the site. It is not just the logo it is a recurring thing. Even if this is not wp:primary I think it fulfills the requirements of wp:natdab. Ranze (talk) 07:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. Per convention with the RM process, if there was any dispute during the week of the request, it should have been voiced then, and closure was fair game after a week. I stand by my no consensus closure, as that was the result of the RM above judged to my best ability. I say, just open another (new!) RM here and explain your counter by my suggestion (as the closer of the previous RM) and ping Mrschimpf about it. Don't think anyone will dispute another RM opening, hope that helps — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 23:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

I might not reply in time. Better to sort it out ahead of time when there is no rush. Ranze (talk) 10:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)