Talk:Unitary Socialist Party (Italy, 1922)

Requested move 12 February 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 06:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

United Socialist Party (Italy, 1922–30) → United Socialist Party (Italy, 1922) – Usually the titles only show the date of foundation of the party Wololoo (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The ending date is useful extra information. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, but all others italian parties have not the ending date in their title (Democratic Party (Italy, 1913), National Union (Italy, 1923), Union of the Centre (1993), Socialist Party (Italy, 1996), Italian People's Party (1994), Italian People's Party (1919), Action Party (Italy, 1848)), for consistency all titles should have the same format. However I change my request, the title should be Unitary Socialist Party (Italy, 1922), that is the correct translation ("United Socialist Party" means "Partito Socialista Unito")--Wololoo (talk) 15:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC) --Wololoo (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Strongly support per consistency (I perfectly agree with User:Wololoo). --Checco (talk) 17:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

As already explained, I made a mistake with the request, indeed the correct name for this page should be "Unitary Socialist Party (Italy, 1922)" (as explained here). If there are no dissenting opinions I'll move the page to the correct translation --Wololoo (talk) 23:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Apologies for missing that, my mistake. Go ahead with that move whenever you want (and the article for the 1949 party). Let me know if you need the admin tools for it. Jenks24 (talk) 10:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Good. User:Wololoo, go ahead with all the moves! What about moving also Movement of Unitarian Communists to "Movement of Unitary Communists" or, even better, "Unitary Communists"? What do you think? --Checco (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, then I proceed. About the Movement of Unitarian Communists I have no particular preferences --Wololoo (talk) 21:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * There is precedent to use the name Unitarian Communists from existing texts, even though it not a literal translation, see here, here and here for examples.--Autospark (talk) 23:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)