Talk:UnitedHealth Group/Archives/2023/June

Foundations
Hello again! As User:CNMall41 points out immediately above, there are quite a few issues with this article. I'm attempting to address these by submitting edit requests on behalf of UHG. This time, I'd like to address the "Foundations" section, which has a single company-published source with a "how" tag. I suggest replacing the text with the following, which provides an overview of UHG's philanthropic work and foundations, based on news coverage:

More could be said about UHF and UHCCF, as both have funded many charitable activities. My primary goal here is to provide readers with a more comprehensive summary of UHG's philanthropic work based on secondary sources and address the "how" tag. I'm hoping User:voorts, User:CNMall41 and others can update the article appropriately. Thanks! Barbara at UHG (talk) 17:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Change Healthcare update
I have identified another issue with the Wikipedia article, so I'm submitting a request to update the "Legal issues" section on behalf of UHG. I suggest updating the Change Healthcare paragraph, which mentions the Justice Department's lawsuit without offering any sort of conclusion. According to Reuters, "A U.S. judge denied the department's bid in September, paving the way for the October completion of the all-cash deal. The department then appealed the ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia." The article also confirms that the Justice Department dismissed its own appeal in March 2023. Could an editor please update the article appropriately? Otherwise, the article suggests the lawsuit is unresolved. Thank you in advance. -Barbara at UHG (talk) 17:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Reply 28-JUN-2023

 * 1) Multiple request templates which jump around to different sections are problematic in that it's not entirely clear in which order they are to be answered. I would suggest one template per section per request. Once that request is answered, the next one can be done. Alternatively, all the requests can be merged into one. I understand that some editors prefer that larger requests be submitted piecemeal, however, that advice is usually predicated on submitting those disparate requests one at a time, and not simultaneously, as has been done here. Please either consolidate the requests into one, or submit them in sequence, waiting for each one to be answered in kind.
 * 2) Additionally, any text which is suggested to be removed ought to be included with the request. Simply stating "replace this section" is insufficient; the verbatim text to be removed also needs to be included with the request. I see that in one request the information was submitted verbatim of what was problematic, however, the subsequent wording of the request left it unclear exactly what was to be removed (e.g., "I propose removing the first paragraph of the "Legal issues" section because there's additional text in the article about stock options and McGuire's resignation.", which does not elaborate upon which text from the first paragraph is to be removed). Requests asking for indeterminate changes (e.g., I suggest updating the Change Healthcare paragraph) without describing the verbatim text to be removed cannot be reviewed.  Spintendo  01:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)