Talk:United Issarak Front

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on United Issarak Front. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080906220413/http://www.uq.edu.au/access_history/two-two/khmer.pdf to http://www.uq.edu.au/access_history/two-two/khmer.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

About the Khmer script
Though someone remove the Khmer script from this article with different ridiculous reasons again and again (see its edit history: ), the Khmer script should be in this article. Khmer script should not add on English Wikipedia? It is unnecessary to add it to the infobox? The logic is equal to we should not add English text "Donald Trump" in Arabic Wikipedia article "دونالد ترامب", only its "English Arabization" is needed. So he is chopping logic, it's absolutely ridiculous.

The Khmer script is "សមាគមខ្មែរឥស្សរៈ" (source: ); "សមាគម" means society or association, "ខ្មែរ" means Khmer, "ឥស្សរៈ" means Issarak. It takes me a lot of time to find it. Few people can read Khmer script here; if someday the Khmer script is removed, and its script is hard to find, it will be a loss to Wikipedia. So, I decide to achieve it here.--112.49.100.178 (talk) 03:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The khmer script may be added to the main body of text, but it is not needed in the infobox, also dont remove the latin-script version of the khmer name as it is useful to people who dont understand khmer script! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Khmer language is written in Khmer script; the native script is Khmer script; so I think, "native name" in the infobox SHOULD use Khmer script. And, I had NEVER remove Khmer Romanization; it is in the main text, following the Khmer script. Why you say I have "removed the latin-script"? It makes me very confused. That's why I think you're "chopping logic" before. We are both badtempered, both of us should be calm. I don't want edit war. Again, I strongly suggest that Khmer script SHOULD be remained in this article.--112.5.241.111 (talk) 04:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)