Talk:United Kingdom Election Results/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC) I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Fine
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, another excellent article. One tiny quibble - in the section Contents: you have the sentence: As of 2007, the website was located at www.election.demon.co.uk.. It is still there so perhaps this phrase could be updated. I will pass the article and leave it to your judgement on the update. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and ✅. Cirt (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, another excellent article. One tiny quibble - in the section Contents: you have the sentence: As of 2007, the website was located at www.election.demon.co.uk.. It is still there so perhaps this phrase could be updated. I will pass the article and leave it to your judgement on the update. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and ✅. Cirt (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and ✅. Cirt (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)