Talk:United Online

Notability Concerns
Is this company notable? The companies it owns maybe; but is there anything to show that this company in itself is notable? I'm minded to nominate this under afd; but I'd be grateful if anybody could provide any sources to satisfy my concerns before I do this. B1atv 06:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC).

COMMENT —Preceding unsigned comment added by AmpleTech (talk • contribs) 08:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC) This company is notable in its relations to other businesses, especially if linked to ethical questions as mentioned at classmates.com and Names Database. Society require knowledge about large corporations and the skeletons they may keep in their closets, not merely to discredit such corporations, but to learn more about its true character. Given the present financial situation and the events leading to it, I am sure that society would like to learn more about things hidden behind a Logo or Brand Name to give them the option to make informed decisions on where they want to spend or invest their money (Also see The Corporation).

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.untd.com/companyinfo/about.html http://sitemapzone.blogspot.com/2009/06/classmatescom.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. NortyNort (Holla) 11:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

"Opinion of Ex Employees" Relevance
The section titled "Opinion of Ex Employees" seems inappropriate and irrelevant to the Wikipedia entry. I have not seen anything similar in use for other articles - It is not credible (Glassdoor opinions are not a credible reference source) and appears to be disgruntled ex-employee(s) who are venting. I suggest deleting this section Cryptodd (talk) 00:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)