Talk:United Opposition of Serbia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MX (talk · contribs) 17:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Review: Part 1
Hello. I'll be reviewing this article. Part 1 will consist of full read and copyediting suggestions. I'll look at prose, style, images, etc. Part 2 will consist of source review, citations, and lead/infobox verification. Since I already worked on United for the Victory of Serbia, I feel this article is appropriate for me to review. MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 17:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Part 1 checks out. Prose is good, style complies with our policy, and I found no instances of close paraphrasing / plagiarism. Foreign languange sources accepted in good faith. Please review my copyedits and let me know if you have any questions.
 * Thanks for copy-editing. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I've also copy-edited for a bit. If you've checked everything, then all seems to be good now. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:46, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Review: Part 2

 * - This claim is in the lead paragraphs but not cited elsewhere in the body. Please add this fact in the body with the appropriate source.
 * ✅ Big tent was unsourced, removed it. I've re-worded this sentence a bit. This is backed up by Ref9 and Ref12. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2022 (UTC)


 * - Same goes for this fact in the infobox.
 * ✅ Removed. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2022 (UTC)


 * - The day is mentioned here but nowhere else. I just want to make sure it is actually the 21st and not another date. Please check add the 21th or whatever the correct date is to the body paragraphs with a source.
 * ✅ Backed up by ref 23. Added this in the text. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)


 * - I just want to make sure since I cannot read Serbian. Is all Members information in the infobox cited with this source? I tried doing searches of the party names with the Serbian (romanticized and not) and didn't find same of the names. I also want to make sure the source cites their main idealogy, leaders, political position, etc. This has to be cited here and not in their respective articles per WP:CIRCULAR. If not we may need a source for each party and its supporting information.
 * Ref 38 backs up the claim that Vukadinović was a part of the coalition. Do you want me to add sources for ideologies? --Vacant0 (talk) 17:13, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ I've added the sources for the table. Vacant0 (talk) 17:37, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

GA assessment
All issues/comments have been addressed and the article is ready for GA. Great job! MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 16:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)