Talk:United States Army Materiel Command

Untitled
Definite stub or written by someone who works there. Way too slick and positive. Boils (talk) 00:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Agree. The problem is that the material is just a copy of an article written and published by the organisation itself.  Essentially, it is an organisational autobiography.  That the material is public domain means that we can use it verbatim, but doesn't mean we must. -- Whpq (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Way too slick and positive? That's silly.  It just lists what they do, their responsibilities, and some facts about the history and the organization.  I'm not saying more can't be added, but what's here is pretty neutral and a pretty good starting point.  How is stating the year they were founded or who the current commander is not neutral?  Take the tag off and, if you want to add more, all the Army Regs are availble online.  Start reading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.11.111.44 (talk) 18:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)