Talk:United States Code Congressional and Administrative News

GA Review
I have read the GA guidelines carefully and decided this counts as a good article. I agree that this article is not likely to get much longer and I'm a believer that length isn't a sign of quality. I can make no suggestions to put this article into a higher class except, if it is possible, try to find various references rather than relying on the same ones over and again Douglike 23:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Who publishes it?
I added the fact that the United States Code Congressional and Administrative News is a West Group publication. This fact is, in my opinion, important enough that its absence would make the article deficient. 38.100.34.2 23:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

GA review &mdash; kept
This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,Ruslik 12:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Not a government publication
If USCCAN is published by West Group, then by definition, it is not a government publication. I am therefore removing the category "Publications of the United States Government". --Eastlaw (talk) 00:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Sections in article
I removed the Sections banner from the article because I don't believe the article is long enough to warrant sections. The article is only 241 words(excluding image caption) and the help page section on Section size policies(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Section#Section_size_policies) indicates that individual sections can be anywhere between 80 and 500 words. Since the article is only two paragraphs and does not need a section break to enhance clarity, readability, or ease of finding information in the article, I seen no reason whatsoever to divide the article into sections. It is a short article that is not likely to ever get any longer(as recognized in the GA review), so division into sections is unwarranted. -Dekkanar (talk) 19:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

GAR request
I can't for the life of me figure what lead an editor to put a GAR request template on this page, so I have removed it. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

GA status
Part of the GA criteria is layout, which means that the article needs to have sections and a lead. Will leave a note here to see if anyone watching the page and familiar with the article can resolve this. AIR corn (talk) 03:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)