Talk:United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review

Disagree on Merger
I disagree that In re Sealed Case should be merged into the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review article. The decision was historic and separate. Perhaps if there were hundreds of disclosures, a "greatest hits" section could be added to the article. But, as it stands now, I recommend the articles not be merged. Saebvn (talk) 21:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/about/judges/roney.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

FISA Review Court discussion
FYI, I have listed FISA Review Court on TfD here as I feel it is unnecessary. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)