Talk:United States and state-sponsored terrorism/Archive 1

Commercial Terrorism
The opening section of the article ends with this sensational claim: "Support was also geared toward ensuring a conducive environment for American corporate interests abroad, especially when these interests came under threat from democratic regimes.[4][5]"

However, when reading the rest of the article, it did not seem to elaborate or back up this statement in any significant way. That definitely seems like an oversight. Either it needs to lay out the case for that statement, or it shouldn't be included in the opening section at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.88.165.61 (talk) 10:24, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The article is obviously incomplete, outlining only two examples - the Cubans and the Contras - and providing no real explanation why the U.S. government acted the way it did. TFD (talk) 15:59, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Recent revert
The difference between this article and the "state terrorism" article is that this one discusses support to non-state actors. The El Salvador case is support for state actors, however illegitimate they may have been. It belongs there. You can edit that page directly after you have a certain number of edits, or you could use the edit-semi-protected template as before (unclear why you deleted that). Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Um, ok when I have spare time I guess. But that page is just a bunch of arguments back and forth.--S0mewhat Damaged05 (talk) 00:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're right; but the solution is to fix that (easier said than done, I know!) rather than mess with the inclusion criteria elsewhere. Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * It is helpful when disputing an edit to provide a link. It is only state terrorism if it is carried out overtly by governments.  Secret actions whether carried out by out-of-uniform or off-duty police or soldiers or by private civilians, even if sponsored by the host government, are not state terrorism.  TFD (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on United States and state-sponsored terrorism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151004050839/http://www.congresscheck.com/2008/07/10/former-pakistan-general-us-supports-jundullah-terrorists-in-iran/ to http://www.congresscheck.com/2008/07/10/former-pakistan-general-us-supports-jundullah-terrorists-in-iran/
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151004112431/http://atimes.com/atimes/south_asia/fg20df05.html to http://www.atimes.com/atimes/south_asia/fg20df05.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 18:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Jundallah
The U.S. never provided material support to Jundallah. What actually happened is that Israeli Mossad agents supporting Jundallah presented themselves as CIA officers. See Foreign Policy: [http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/01/13/false-flag/ "Buried deep in the archives of America's intelligence services are a series of memos, written during the last years of President George W. Bush's administration, that describe how Israeli Mossad officers recruited operatives belonging to the terrorist group Jundallah by passing themselves off as American agents. According to two U.S. intelligence officials, the Israelis, flush with American dollars and toting U.S. passports, posed as CIA officers in recruiting Jundallah operatives—what is commonly referred to as a 'false flag' operation. The memos, as described by the sources, one of whom has read them and another who is intimately familiar with the case, investigated and debunked reports from 2007 and 2008 accusing the CIA, at the direction of the White House, of covertly supporting Jundallah—a Pakistan-based Sunni extremist organization. ... The report then made its way to the White House, according to the currently serving U.S. intelligence officer. The officer said that Bush 'went absolutely ballistic' when briefed on its contents. ... The debate over Jundallah was resolved only after Bush left office when, within his first weeks as president, Barack Obama drastically scaled back joint U.S.-Israel intelligence programs targeting Iran, according to multiple serving and retired officers. The decision was controversial inside the CIA, where officials were forced to shut down 'some key intelligence-gathering operations,' a recently retired CIA officer confirmed. This action was followed in November 2010 by the State Department's addition of Jundallah to its list of foreign terrorist organizations—a decision that one former CIA officer called 'an absolute no-brainer.'"]
 * The FBI did cultivate sources within Jundallah—which continued even after the CIA barred the most minimal contact with the group after the 2007 Zahedan bombings—but this was intelligence-gathering, not "state-sponsored terrorism." See The New York Times:

"Current and former officials say the American government never directed or approved any Jundallah operations. And they say there was never a case when the United States was told the timing and target of a terrorist attack yet took no action to prevent it." Indeed, contradicting earlier reports, it seems Pakistan captured Abdolmalek Rigi and sent him to his death in Iran with U.S. support. Quoting Foreign Policy again: "Rigi was turned over to the Iranians after the Pakistani government informed the United States that it planned to do so. The United States, this officer said, did not raise objections to the Pakistani decision. Iran, meanwhile, has consistently claimed that Rigi was snatched from under the eyes of the CIA, which it alleges supported him. 'It doesn't matter,' the former intelligence officer said of Iran's charges. 'It doesn't matter what they say. They know the truth.'" If this belongs anywhere, it would be at Israel and state-sponsored terrorism.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 23:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Drug trafficking allegations
The article currently states:
 * Money was also raised for the Contras through drug trafficking, which the United States was aware of. Senator John Kerry's 1988 Committee on Foreign Relations report on Contra drug links concluded that "senior U.S. policy makers were not immune to the idea that drug money was a perfect solution to the Contras' funding problems".

Can you provide some feedback? That sounds just vague enough to give a slanted impression of what actually happened. Should the first sentence say "raised by" instead of "raised for"? Also, my impression is that Oliver North floated the idea of using drug money to support the Contras, but that it didn't actually happened. The relevance to this article is a bit lost on me, too. -Location (talk) 17:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll get back to you on that. Rgr09 (talk) 22:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

La Repubblica and Operation Gladio
This paragraph is one example of what bothers me about the article;

"In 1998, Milan judge Guido Salvini indicted U.S. Navy officer David Carrett on charges of political and military espionage for his participation in the Piazza Fontana bombing et al. Salvini also opened up a case against Sergio Minetto, an Italian official of the U.S.-NATO intelligence network, and "collaboratore di giustizia" Carlo Digilio (Uncle Otto), who served as CIA coordinator in Northeastern Italy in the sixties and seventies. The newspaper la Repubblica reported that Carlo Rocchi, CIA's man in Milan was discovered in 1995 searching for information concerning Operation Gladio."

Keep in mind that la Repubblica is traditionally a radical-left paper, so naturally, they're going to go along with the Soviet line that and tell people that it was a false flag terrorist plot by the CIA, rather than the anti-communist stay behind organization that it truly was. -User:DanTD (talk) 12:34, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on United States and state-sponsored terrorism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080428050841/http://www.mast.udel.edu/873/Spring%202007/ScottTruves.pdf to http://www.mast.udel.edu/873/Spring%202007/ScottTruves.pdf
 * Added tag to https://segue.middlebury.edu/index.php?action=site&site=psci0236a-f06
 * Added tag to http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/04/27/v-fullstory/2188315/prominent-exile-militant-orlando.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160214095844/http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/caminos-guerrero.htm to http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/caminos-guerrero.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527120446/http://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/opinions/cases/posadacarriles/docs/cr87doc44.pdf to http://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/opinions/cases/posadacarriles/docs/cr87doc44.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927045151/http://www.local10.com/news/4402775/detail.html to http://www.local10.com/news/4402775/detail.html
 * Added tag to http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/world/americas/15578403.htm
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120920/http://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/opinions/cases/posadacarriles/default.asp to http://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/opinions/cases/posadacarriles/default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

NPOV

 * This article only contains about 7 examples.
 * Piazza Fontana bombing USA involvement is disputed as per reliable sources and there were 3 trials in Italy. USA involvement is only a conspiracy theory.
 * Years of Lead (Italy) local both left-wing and right-wing incidents of political terrorism.USA involvement is debated is not terrorism
 * 1973 Chilean coup d'état and United States intervention in Chile is not terrorism in almost all reliable sources. USA direct involvement in Chilean coup has been debated and most and is a only a conspiracy theory as per most reliable sources.Even then is not Terrorism.Death of Salvador Allende is suicide after almost several investigations.
 * Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles is WP:UNDUE
 * Right-wing paramilitarism in Colombia .USA involvement is limited and is Human Rights Violation
 * Los Pepes is an anti Drug movement killing Pablo Escobar and drug lords even if killed extra judicially is not terrorism only Human Rights Violations.Nervegolgi (talk) 20:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * There's no substance to any of this. a) If there is controversy over US involvement supported by reliable sources, that should be added to the article; no such attempt has been made. b) "USA involvement is debated is not terrorism" Aside from being ungrammatical: Wikipedia doesn't care what you have to say about this. We present what reliable sources say. Do you have any sources that contradict what's in the article? c) The article doesn't discuss the 1973 coup at all: have you even read it? The assassination of Schneider may or may not belong here; but that's a different discussion. d) "Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles is WP:UNDUE" Why? Do you have sources about them presenting a different narrative? e) Does something being a human rights violation preclude it from being terrorism? Again, it's the sources that matter. f) ditto. TL;DR: you've provided no sources at all backing up anything you say: you need to do that. Vanamonde (talk) 20:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)