Talk:United States v. Apple (2012)

First review. Wh-237 (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

 * 1) all quotes have citations
 * 2) lead section concisely summarized article
 * 3) non-quoted text is sparing with jargon
 * 4) wikilinks: maybe link to Sherman Act in lead
 * 5) (skipping check for orphan status before move)
 * 6) neutrality looks fine, looks verifiable
 * 7) source links work fine
 * 8) not sure if contribution is clear; it's all quotes at this point
 * 9) non-quoted text has correct grammar and stuff
 * 10) (skipping check for categorization before move)
 * 11) PROBLEM: UNCLEAR ON IMPORTANCE OF TOPIC
 * hm, all references are opinion text
 * 1) PROBLEM: CITATIONS ARE JUST URLS
 * 2) infobox present. Maybe consider switching to Infobox United States District Court case
 * 3) (skipping check for talk template before move)

Has this article moved? I'm holding off on DYK nomination.