Talk:United States v. Booker

Untitled
Wow, does _this_ page need a lot of work! Booker is a hugely siginificant case in the federal sentencing field. Can anyone help? Sholom 16:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I have added background on the case and will add more when I have the time. The intro needs to have info on the implications based on the Booker ruling and the slew of appeals that followed by defendents.  Assawyer 17:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Seeing as how the cleanup tag has languished for a year, I'll take on the task of cleaning up. The decision is lengthy, and so it may take a while for me to discuss all the relevant aspects of the case.  ---Axios023 03:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The article needs to be completely rewritten as it appears to be largely copied from the sources. &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 23:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Missing Dissent
It’s missing dissent from Thomas. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/543/220/ 207.96.32.81 (talk) 14:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)