Talk:United States v. Davis (2014)

sources needed
, thanks for writing the page. it needs sources for the apparent copy-paste work done though, from what looks like this blog, for example. it also needs the primary source, the ruling inline, which right now is an external link.

The last sentence of the background section looks like it misses a verb- maybe "is" or "was" ? otherwise the verb "required" would need another preposition than "for". thanks. --Wuerzele (talk) 05:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I've added inline sources to the court's decision, which is where most of the quotes come from. I don't recall ever seeing the blog you mention, and i don't think we can use it as a source. I also copy edited the intro. If you have further concerns about it please list them here.21:53, 14 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArnoldReinhold (talk • contribs)

Electronic Frontier Foundation has an article on this, which could be cited and sourced in the article. They also have a lot of documents related to the case. 80.222.34.157 (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)