Talk:United States v. McMahon

Linda McMahon
let's discuss that concern you have here. That statement in the article was done based upon the source that states that she was not involved in the steroids issue. Please can you provide a source that contradicts the claims in the NHR source? already adapted the wording of it to make it less defensive, can I ask what your concern about that quote is?  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 14:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * To say she had nothing to do with the steroid issue is an unsourced statement. Assertations without proper sourcing should not be on a Wikipedia article. Using the quote from the WWE lawyer -- basically her own lawyer -- as factual proof is clear and obvious violation of WP:BIASED (I think financial bias applies here).
 * Unless, you want to change it to "During Linda McMahon's 2010 United States Senate campaign, the steroid trial was used by her political opponents to attack her. A lawyer representing WWE stated that she was unrelated to the scandal." Holidayruin (talk) 00:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I would have no problem with that wording.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 15:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Changed, thanks. Holidayruin (talk) 16:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)