Talk:United States v. Ramsey (1926)

This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article
(this is "duplicated" here for when the review is no longer transcluded)

This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. Congratulations; nice work! Sincerely,  North8000  (talk) 16:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC) GA Reviewer

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on United States v. Ramsey (1926). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130729090945/http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/O/OS005.html to http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/O/OS005.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130711204126/http://digital.library.okstate.edu/Chronicles/v019/v019p070.html to http://digital.library.okstate.edu/Chronicles/v019/v019p070.html
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6IuNe3DBH to http://blog.nmai.si.edu/main/2011/03/the-osage-murders-oil-wealth-betrayal-and-the-fbis-first-big-case.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527100112/http://www.lb8.uscourts.gov/pubsandservices/histsociety/coa8_shorthist.html to http://www.lb8.uscourts.gov/pubsandservices/histsociety/coa8_shorthist.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 21 April 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by nom The creation of an article on the other case renders my proposal moot * Pppery * has returned 11:59, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

United States v. Ramsey (1926) → United_States v. Ramsey – Only "United States v. Ramsey" with an article (move over dab page listing this case and a redlink) * Pppery * has returned 02:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


 * But United States v. Ramsey (1977), 431 U.S. 606 (1977) also happened (see ), even though it does not have an article here, and the reader would prefer to know at the start which of these 2 law cases is being described. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose I have created United States v. Ramsey (1977) --DannyS712 (talk) 08:51, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I've always wanted to "strong oppose" a proposal, and this seemed like the best way to do it - writing an article. I've nominated it for DYK too! --DannyS712 (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.