Talk:United for Peace and Justice/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

To uphold the quality of Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of November 18, 2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

Reviewer: Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 01:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Previous protests
 * Why is this section called called Previous protests? Previous to what?


 * Seems strange to launch straight into a list of protests before we're told anything about the organisation's history. In general, I don't feel that this article adequately covers its topic in sufficient scope to meet GA criterion 3.


 * This list of protests needs to be converted to prose.


 * The list appears to stop at the beginning of 2007, yet there have been several more protests since then.


 * Unity statement
 * There has been a request for citation since February 2007.


 * Need to explain what a "Unity Statement" is, and why it still apparently focuses on the Bush administration.


 * "No Stolen Elections!" campaign
 * It's unclear why this campaign has been singled out for its own section.


 * Sharp disagreement with ANSWER
 * There's no context for this section. Who or what is ANSWER, and why does it matter that they fell out with UFPJ?


 * Member groups
 * This section is just a long list.


 * References
 * There are at least two dead links.