Talk:United for the Victory of Serbia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MX (talk · contribs) 06:10, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Review: Part 1
Hello. I'll be reviewing this article. Part 1 will consist of full read and copyediting suggestions. I'll look at prose, style, images, etc. Part 2 will consist of source review, citations, and lead/infobox verification. MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 06:10, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Infobox

 * Information mentioned in the infobox has to be mentioned and cited elsewhere in the body paragraphs, per WP:INFOBOXCITE.
 * ✅ Already mentioned. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * There is no mention of "Big tent", the colors, and the slogan anywhere, please include them in the body paragraphs with a source
 * ✅ Added source for the slogan, replaced "Big tent" with "Centre", which is backed up by sources. The colors do not need a source, this can be already seen in the logo. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:46, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

History

 * - Per MOS:CURRENT, the "since then" can quickly get outdated. Please add the appropriate phrasing to remove time-sensitive wording.
 * ✅ Fixed. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * - Who/what is the RIK? There is no mention of this organization or person before. Please spell it out if it is an acronym and/or consider hyperlinking it too.
 * ✅ Fixed. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * - Please hyperlink this party and add its acronym too.
 * ✅ Fixed. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * - Keep PSG only without hyperlinking for this instance
 * ✅ Fixed. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Electoral performance

 * This entire section is unsourced. Could you please add a source that backs up the information mentioned here? I'll be checking this info since it is numerical and not entirely in a foreign language.
 * Sources for the results can be found on their respective pages, they are not needed here. This is a common practice among the majority of political party articles, even among GA articles. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi - Per WP:CIRCULAR, we are not allowed to use another Wikipedia article as the "source" for another. Every claim in an article has to have an inline citation. If you think you may have trouble citing the sources appropriate, you can share them here and I can help you. MX (  ✉  •  ✎  ) 16:50, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I don't need help, I'll add the sources now. --Vacant0 (talk) 16:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Added refs. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Notes and references

 * Comments and claims in these sections also require citations as they may run the risk of being original research if not included. Please add references to these sentences.
 * ✅ Done. --Vacant0 (talk) 13:04, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * ❌ This was a comment about "Notes" a, b, and c. They are still unsourced.
 * ✅ --Vacant0 (talk) 16:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Review: Part 2

 * I checked all the references and made sure they take readers to the appropriate sources. All checks out.
 * I checked a few sources for appropriate attribution and all checks out.
 * All of the sources are reliable; none require print/offline access but they are in a foreign language and accepted in good faith. Nothing controversial was found that made me request a direct quote.
 * Article is well written; should nominator want to promote it to FA status, I recommend a copyedit request at GOCE.