Talk:Universal Character Set feature

Proposed deletion - move text to IBM 1403 and make this a redirect?
, - the feature may not be (and probably isn't) notable enough for a standalone article, but it might be interesting enough to discuss in the article about the printer for which that's a feature.

Perhaps the right thing to do is move this discussion of that feature to IBM 1403 and make this a redirect to the section containing that discussion. Guy Harris (talk) 21:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * UCS was a feature for a bunch of printers, not just the 1403. If the material is to be moved to the 1403 article then it should be replicated for, e.g., 3211. Perhaps a better home would be IBM hammer printers. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 22:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, and then expand it to mention the other printers with the feature, with references if available. Guy Harris (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, and then expand it to mention the other printers with the feature, with references if available. Guy Harris (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Decided to boldly merge it into IBM hammer printers since the discussion above seems to have stalled and I thought it would be a bummer if this short albeit interesting tidbit of history got removed. Feel free to whack me if I missed any details. DigitalIceAge (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe that every printer currently mentioned in IBM hammer printers supported UCS except the 1403 Model 1 and the 3270 printers. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC) --Revised 18:52, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe that every printer currently mentioned in IBM hammer printers supported UCS except the 1403 Model 1 and the 3270 printers. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC) --Revised 18:52, 25 November 2022 (UTC)