Talk:Universal Migrator

Why disambiguate?
Shouldn't we just combine the articles at this point? Leaving them seperate is mildly silly. Especially after the release-as-one-album thing a few years back, there is little point in treating them as two seperate albums. 春・ Harukaze ・風 18:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I will suggest the merge on the articles and wait a few days to make sure there are no objections. Neelix (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, both albums are musically different, contain different subjects in their songs and both articles have much information. Merging them would result in a quite long article, I think. Victor Lopes (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

They're two completely different albums (Although the story is a continuation of the first Migrator album). They shouldn't be merged. Jerry teps (talk) 06:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't merge. There are two albums, two storylines, and there will a giant page if we merge it. Garret Beaumain (talk) 18:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Combining them would lead to a very large article. -71.10.25.29 (talk) 01:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to close this discussion as it's been 2 years since the argument was raised. Plus there's a clear consensus that they're two different albums (the original argument was barely an argument anyway (no offense, but it didn't really state why they should be merged)). Jerry teps (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2009 (UTC)