Talk:Universalism and the Latter Day Saint movement

Rating
, no disrespect whatsoever. I have no reasoning for giving the article a start-class rating. I have been going through many of the Latter Day Saint movement articles and giving the articles that had not been assessed a rating. Most of the ones that I had assessed were legitimately a start class, but looking back at this one I can definitely see it is at least c-class, or more likely b-class. Given many of the references are primary sources (i.e. scriptures) this wouldn't quite be up to GA status yet, but if alright I will update the article to the actual class. Rollidan (talk) 16:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)


 * No offense taken. There are a lot of primary sources, but they are there for convenience and I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing. Every sentence can be traced to a secondary, independent source. Let me know if there is a spot where you feel the secondary source is unclear. Epachamo (talk) 22:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)