Talk:University College, Oxford

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on University College, Oxford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205043023/http://www.univ.ox.ac.uk/visiting_the_college/history_of_the_college/ to http://www.univ.ox.ac.uk/visiting_the_college/history_of_the_college/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Sir David Edward.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Sir David Edward.jpg

Climate Crisis Response section
This section has now been reverted and readded three times so a talk page discussion is needed, rather than a slow edit war. ,, , . My opinion is
 * Remove the first paragraph references the Climate League of Oxford and Cambridge pressure group and a local paper which had spoken to the same group and did not analyse what the group was saying, so both sources are primary. The second paragraph also has primary sources, the Conference of Colleges and University College. TSventon (talk) 11:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Remove the section per TSventon. I think Denisarona and Isabelle Belato reverted because they saw IPs blank a section while on recent changes patrol, not necessarily because they would disagree, but they are obviously free to chip in. 15 (talk) 15:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)