Talk:University Hospitals Ahuja Medical Center

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on University Hospitals Ahuja Medical Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721093313/http://www.uhhospitals.org/AboutUH/Vision2010/tabid/1291/Default.aspx to http://www.uhhospitals.org/AboutUH/Vision2010/tabid/1291/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Verifiable source
I do not want to sound scolding nor do I intend to rant. But...

1. the 18 month old "advert" tag is utterly correct.

2. two of the referneces look to me as though someone was trying to design references which violate the rule that references must be verifiable to the maximum extent possible. There is absolutely no possible way to verify a "personal interview". If Wikipedia allowed this, then it would destroy the requirement that references be from reliable sources. Anyone could post their own original research and use a "personal interview" as a reference.

3. I have made over 7,300 edits, and this is only the second article that was so obviously written by the Public Relations Department at the institution the article is about. The original author had no idea how to name a reference, and violated the guidance that "Names must not be purely numeric; they should have semantic value so that they can be more easily distinguished from each other by human editors." In fact the editor who originally but these so-called references in, read the guidance where it says" The syntax to define a named footnote is: To invoke the named footnote: and utterly failed to realize that the text "name" is a placeholder for the actual name the editor decides to use. They also spoke to their boss, and quoted her as a reference, i.e. item two in this three item list.

Sorry if this sounds like a rant, but the page was extraordinary in my extensive experience, and seemed to me to require a strong posting. Nick Beeson (talk) 20:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC)