Talk:University Transition Program

Original research and/or unverified claims
None of the information on the page, particularly the sections for courses, global citizenship program, and criticism, are verified. The tone of the article suggests that most of the information provided consists of original research. - Adevish (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Most of the information is, surprisingly good about the program. There has to be a neutral point of view, so are there any criticisms? TheStarter (talk) 09:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Read the first paragraph in the article. Doesn't it sound more than a little bit fishy? I mean, "brainwash"? I'm a member of the UBC Transitions Program. It's a great program. You go ahead 2 years. How in the world is that bad? PS: I'm WHITE. Asian-Canadian is a horrible misconception. Doombot257 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC).

I added some sources (both primary AND secondary) for the information in the article; I'd consider it verified. Re @waken talk 23:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Classify?
I know this is listed as a C - class, but this looks more of a Start-class. No research, no significant changes, no neutral point of view, other thoughts? TheStarter (talk) 09:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

http://www.vsb.bc.ca/vsbprograms/kto12/TransitionProgramReunion.htm http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Examining+the+evolution+of+the+transition+program:+preparing...-a0113337793 http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=23aed870-709b-4245-930e-9bcc43d99d2b

Knock yourselves out. Oh, yes, all the positive stuff is unverifiable original research, but so would any criticisms. 142.103.92.84 (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)stufsz

Major reconstruction of links required
The Transitions site has recently moved but I'm not sure how the page ended up so messy. It requires some attention. The new site is. 75.156.69.71 (talk) 05:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 08:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)