Talk:University of Belgrano

The poor quality of the institution is an issue that should be in the article.--PortoPuto 22:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Regardless of the alleged university quality, Wikipedia is NOT the best place to include that kind of statements. Also your username can be considered offensive, so please change it or you'll blocked. --  COA   22:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that it should be written in the article.
 * By the way, I've changed my username as you requested. --PortoPuto 22:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you kidding? Your username looks exactly the same. This is your last warning. Please stop vandalizing or you'll be blocked. --  COA   22:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Quality discussion
Just saying the quality is bad, or "some people say that" is a opinion, and uncited and unverifable opinions are discouraged. However, if you can find a source that describes the universtiy in this way, then that's fine. The difference is between Hope that helps. MartinRe 00:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * "Some people say X is bad" - claim has no source, can't be verified - and see Avoid weasel words
 * "Paper X[link] described X as bad" - verifible, source is cited and named.

Please read this before editing the article
Recent vandalism in this article has been unstoppable, please discuss changes here before editing the article. All edits with no consensus will be considered vandalism and removed without any advise. Thanks. --OneEuropeanHeart 22:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)