Talk:University of California, San Diego/GA3

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: domesticenginerd (talk · contribs) 19:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

I am starting a review of this article. -- domest icen ginerd 19:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Completed review of article. Improvements made since last GA review. Still needs some work, though. Marked as "fail" but will give a week or so for improvements to be made before closing out officially. -- domest icen ginerd 03:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * It has been over three weeks since the above: domesticenginerd hasn't edited since July 24, and the nominator, Horserice, hasn't edited since June 29. Under the circumstances, I'm closing the nomination, as no improvements of any significance have been made since the above, and the article has four "citation needed" templates, which is not what you want to see on an article wishing to attain GA status. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:29, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion

 * 1) Many references (over 50%) are from UCSD domain.
 * 2) Citation format is inconsistent.
 * 3) A few citations needed, particularly for viewbook-esque statements.
 * 4) Undue weight to diversity of student body. For instance, there is a table of the ethnic enrollment under "Student Life"; however, there is no reference to it in the text. Also, should elaborate further on background of student body (e.g. in-state, out-of-state, international percentage).
 * 5) Primarily seems like viewbook/advertisement for school. Outside of brief mention of chancellor's salary, does not address any controversies (e.g. 2010 diversity job, 2008 admissions mistake, racism issues [including 2010 fraternity party & 2011 noose], etc.)