Talk:University of Cambridge/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 10:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article. Thanks!  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  10:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Ok. I have not completed my review as this article has significant referencing problems. I stopped reading the article at the Academics section. With so many unreferenced sections I cannot pass the article as it is not compliant with criteria 2. You may renominate this once these issues have been addressed. Thanks!  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  22:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)


 * All of what you define unreferenced sections do not contain references because they cite other articles within Wikipedia that themselves contain references. I think it is a bit exaggerated to require a reference for all of the discoveries when you can simply click on the link and find out that the discoverer worked at Cambridge, or when you can check the Wooden Spoon article, or when you can click on Russel Group and Golden Triangle and I think it is quite obvious that the Cambridge University Library is the central library etc. Plus all this information is anyway contained in the referenced books and websites. I think it is ridiculous to require inline citations for such an enormous amount of information, especially for an article that is not about a controversial topic and does not contain any controversial statements. -- Mark91  it's my world   23:29, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

You put references in the article, not link to another article. Please fix this then renominate.  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  05:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)