Talk:University of Scranton/Archive 1

Handball disambiguation help needed
"The John J. Long, S.J., Center and adjoining William J. Byron, S.J., Recreation Complex house the Department of Exercise Science as well as intercollegiate and intramural basketball, wrestling, handball, tennis, racquetball, volleyball and swimming facilities." is good stuff, but links to the "handball" disambiguation page. If someone could let me know what sort of handball is housed there it would be jolly good. Or, better yet, correct the link and save me a job!LeeG 17:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Scrantonseal.jpg
Image:Scrantonseal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Assessment
Needs WP:MOS work (see part about headers and capitalization), and additional sourcing to get to B class. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I find the prolix style of this article atypical for Wikipedia. In places it reads more like a book than a concise summary. Also, the huge section on academic honor societies might become a redirect to a specialized article. I hate to make major changes entirely on my own.
 * Please see Article size. What do others think?  Jzsj (talk) 14:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have no opinion. My assessment was approaching a decade ago, and the article has grown substantially since then. A quick look without reading the content would make me feel it is bloated, and the history section could be split off to a History of ... article that is standard for colleges. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

If some administrator at the University encourages it here, a decent redo of this article will get done. I agree that the history should be moved to a separate article. More elegant, concise sections should be written throughout, leaving much of the bit on academic honor societies to their Wikipedia links and to the school website. Most of what's in the campus buildings and landmarks section needs to be left to the two other University of Scranton Wikipedia articles that cover the topic. The future of the university could be consigned, for the most part, to the history and buildings articles. The notable alumni section might be left to the separate Wikipedia article that exists, with a few alumni mentioned only by name under their field of expertise. With any encouragement this can get done. Jzsj (talk) 22:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)