Talk:University of Utah Press

issues for cleanup
Most (but not all) of the overtly promotional language has been toned down. Other editors may find time to finish that. The topic suffers from being mostly primary sources, with some unavoidable bias (for instance "distribution partners" is copied from the website without explanation of context). The prizes mentioned are likely nonnotable (otherwise there should be separate topics for those), and the general aim of things like that is promotional, i.e., by casting the sponsor's name into close association with others to increase the sponsor's visibility. The leftover sample list is odd, since there's no given criteria by which it was selected. That's a start TEDickey (talk) 22:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)