Talk:University of Zaragoza

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on University of Zaragoza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140525200034/http://www.unizar.es/instituci%C3%B3n/datos-b%C3%A1sicos to http://www.unizar.es/instituci%C3%B3n/datos-b%C3%A1sicos
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150723173551/https://www.unizar.es/instituci%C3%B3n/historia to https://www.unizar.es/instituci%C3%B3n/historia

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

History of the old Studium
I completed the history of the Studium, specially the beginning of the XVI century. There are basically  6 sources for it, and most of them just with tangential information, small book chapters and short papers written by scholars San Vicente Pino, Pedraza, Pallares, Blasco, Abizanda Broto, and the book about Histoy of the University of Zaragoza, coordinated by Rujula and Lomba,  (2016, but they did not use the documents of Abizanda nor those of Pedraza, nor it has the depth of explaining the mechanism,  teachers, building, lessons or progression in studies), all together they gathered like 50 documents from the end of XV and  beginnings of the XVI century. What Gonzalez Ancín & Towns (2017) did is to use them all, and add 70 more documents they found, and that allowed them to study these mechanisms in detail, well beyond any other scholar before. This means the information from 1477-1530/1540 is well covered. What remains to be completed is what happened after. During the next days I will try complete it with all the other sources, mostly San Vicente Pino & the book from 2016, they provide substantial detail on those later periods of time. It also seems there is no plagiarism anymore in the article, taken from  a website, as a user noticed- RaymondLeffere  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RaymondLeffere (talk • contribs) 15:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)